Besides, check Get-CalendarProcessing id|FL, and then check the value of AutoMateProcessing. Outlook for mac calendar invites automatically accept. I'd suggest you run the cmdlet Get-Mailbox -id|FL and then check the value of RecipientTypeDetails, make sure it is UserMailbox. The meeting request is being accepted automatically or it is put into Calendar folder with Alternetive status?

To create a new partition, click the drive in the list on the left side of the Disk Utility menu. How to do a running head on word for mac. Click the Partition button in Disk Utility's main window. By default, Mac OS X will use the GUID partition table to format the drive. Connect the drive to the Mac. Open Disk Utility. The easiest way to do that is hit CMD and the spacebar at the same time and type in Disk Utility to find the program. Select the drive you want to format. If you don't plan on using the drive for Time Machine, skip steps 5 to 11 below and continue with step 12.

For those that think 2TB is the limit, you are forgetting (or unaware of) LBA. Logical Block Addressing (LBA) adds 48-bit support. In order to overcome the size limit of FAT16, while at the same time allowing DOS (disk operating system) real mode code to handle the format, and without reducing available conventional memory unnecessarily, Microsoft expanded the cluster size yet again, calling the new revision FAT32. Cluster values are represented by 32-bit numbers, of which 28 bits are used to hold the cluster number.

The boot sector uses a 32-bit field for the sector count, limiting the FAT32 volume size to 2 TB for sector size 512; compare the size limits given below.[. For those that think 2TB is the limit, you are forgetting (or unaware of) LBA. Logical Block Addressing (LBA) adds 48-bit support. 48-bit LBA addressing is used by the INT13 BIOS calls during the booting process to access volumes larger than 137GB.

It really doesn't have anything to do with file systems at all, it's simply a way for the bootstrap loader to deal with larger drives whether those drives contain a FAT, NTFS, or one of the various flavours of Linux file systems. The limitations of a file system are determined by the size of its metadata structures. Those data structures really don't have anything to do with LBA addressing. In FAT terms, the maximum size is determined by the cluster size times the number of clusters that a volume can have, and the number of clusters is determined by the number of bits the file system uses to store a cluster number. As described in Hawkeye's post, it works out to 2TB. It is possible to have a larger FAT volume if you use larger cluster sizes - for example if you increase the cluster size from 8KBytes to 32KBytes then a FAT volume can hold up to 8TB of data. But cluster sizes that large are nonstandard - they don't work with Windows and there's a good chance that consumer devices such as the PlayStation won't understand them either.

I just had a similar issue. I had a Seagate 3TB USB Desktop Expansion drive that I wanted to move into my PC for faster access (I only had USB 2.0 on the PC).

Once I did that I couldn't access the filesystem. Returning it to the USB to SATA controller made it work again. Comparing the two I found that in the external case (using the USB to SATA controller) the drive had 4096/4096 logical/physical sector sizes and when connected to the internal motherboard SATA, it had 512/4096 logical/physical sector sizes. Much like the OP sugguests, a 4096 logical sector size allows for > 2TiB partitions, but at the 512 sector size we get the 2TiB limit. I didn't want to copy stuff off (slowly over USB) to somewhere, repartition (GPT), reformat, and copy back, so I kept at it. My ultimate solution was to: Use gdisk (GPT version of fdisk) to make delete and remake the partition spanning the exact same area (using 512 byte sectors0 as the original MBR partition table (which has 4k sectors). This basically amounted to taking the sectors for start/end of the partition in 4K-land and multiplying by 8.

I did have an off-by one on the end, so I added 8 more there and so far so good (e2fsck alerted me to that.) The e2fsk is still going, so I'm not 100% sure I'm safe, but it seems all good in theory and I did mount the files for a bit and they looked fine. Note: I imagine it's obvious I'm running Linux.